[Proposal for initial management of uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction in centers without percutaneous coronary intervention capacity in Peru]. / Propuesta de manejo inicial del infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST no complicado en centros sin capacidad de intervención coronaria percutánea en el Perú.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a clinical entity whose adequate treatment will depend on its prompt recognition, accurate diagnosis, and management in reperfusion networks. The first contact with these patients is generally done in centers without reperfusion capacity, attended by non-cardiologist doctors, and in centers far from hospitals with greater resolution capacity, something that is well known in our country. This manuscript proposes a strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of STEMI in centers without percutaneous coronary intervention capacity of the public health system in Peru, emphasizing not losing sight of electrocardiographic patterns compatible with coronary artery occlusion, adequate fibrinolysis and management of its complications, the treatment of infarction in special populations and highlighting the importance of the pharmacoinvasive strategy as the main form of reperfusion treatment in our country.

Outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention or pharmacoinvasive strategy in a Latin American country.

OBJECTIVE: The primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The pharmacoinvasive strategy (PIs) is a reasonable alternative when prompt PPCI is not possible, especially in resource-limited regions. We aimed to compare PPCI versus PIs outcomes in Peru. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study based on the second Peruvian Registry of STEMI (PERSTEMI II). We compared the characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality of patients undergoing PPCI during the first 12 h and those receiving a PIs. A propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to compare the effects of each treatment strategy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: PIs patients were younger than PPCI patients, had a shorter first medical contact time, first medical contact to reperfusion time, and total ischemic time until reperfusion. Successful PCI was more frequent in the PIs group (84.4% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.035). There were no differences between PIs and PPCI in terms of total in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.703), cardiovascular mortality (4.2% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.735), cardiogenic shock (8.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.326), heart failure (19.8% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.112), or major bleeding (0% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.194). In the propensity score-matched analysis, the rates of cardiovascular mortality, postinfarction heart failure and successful reperfusion were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, no differences were found in the in-hospital outcomes between patients with STEMI who received PIs or PPCI.

[Treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Peru and its relationship with in-hospital adverse events: results from the second peruvian registry of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (PERSTEMI-II).] / Tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio en el Perú y su relación con eventos adversos intrahospitalarios: resultados del segundo registro peruano de infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (PERSTEMI-II).

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and myocardial reperfusion, when adequate, reduces the complications of this entity. The aim of the study was to describe the clinical and treatment characteristics of STEMI in Peru and the relationship of successful reperfusion with in-hospital adverse events. Materials and methods: Prospective, multicenter cohort of STEMI patients attended during 2020 in public hospitals in Peru. We evaluated the clinical, therapeutic characteristics and in-hospital adverse events, also the relationship between successful reperfusion and adverse events. Results: A total of 374 patients were included, 69.5% in Lima and Callao. Fibrinolysis was used in 37% of cases (pharmacoinvasive 26% and fibrinolysis alone 11%), primary angioplasty with < 12 hours of evolution in 20%, late angioplasty in 9% and 34% did not access adequate reperfusion therapies, mainly due to late presentation. Ischemia time was longer in patients with primary angioplasty compared to fibrinolysis (median 7.7 hours (RIQ 5-10) and 4 hours (RIQ 2.3-5.5) respectively). Mortality was 8.5%, the incidence of post-infarction heart failure was 27.8% and of cardiogenic shock 11.5%. Successful reperfusion was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality (RR:0.28; 95%CI: 0.12-0.66, p=0.003) and lower incidence of heart failure during hospitalization (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.43-0.85, p=0.004). Conclusions: Fibrinolysis continues to be the most frequent reperfusion therapy in public hospitals in Peru. Shorter ischemia-to-reperfusion time was associated with reperfusion success, and in turn with fewer in-hospital adverse events.

Factores de riesgo asociados a mortalidad en pacientes adultos con neumonía por SARS- CoV-2 en un hospital público de Lima, Perú / Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia adult patients from Lima, Peru

RESUMEN Objetivo: describir los principales factores asociados a la mortalidad en una cohorte de pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 en un hospital público de Lima, Perú. Materiales y métodos: estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con muestreo no aleatorio por conveniencia. Se incluyó pacientes adultos con sospecha clínica o confirmados para SARS-CoV-2 con pruebas rápidas y/o moleculares. Se identificaron variables demográficas, clínicas, de laboratorio, tomográficas y de tratamiento. Se emplearon técnicas de estadística descriptiva, análisis bivariado y de regresión de Poisson para determinar el riesgo relativo (RR) ajustado. Resultados: se incluyó 122 pacientes, 70,5% del sexo masculino, edad promedio de 55,8 años, con antecedentes de obesidad (25,4%) e hipertensión arterial (HTA 13,1%). El análisis multivariado de los factores clínicos identificó que la edad (RR ajustado [RRa] 1,03; IC 95%: 1,00-1,06, p=0,021), el índice de masa corporal (IMC, RRa 1,03; IC 95%: 1,01-1,05; p=0,006), la HTA (RRa 1,68; IC 95%: 1,09-2,56; p=0,017), el índice de PaO2/FiO2 (RRa 0,99; IC 95%: 0,99-1,00; p<0,001), la exposición a lopinavir/ritonavir (RRa 0,83; IC 95%: 0,76-0,91; p<0,001), y corticoides sistémicos (RRa 1,18; IC 95%: 1,09-1,27; p<0,001) estuvieron asociados a la mortalidad de manera significativa. Conclusiones: la edad, IMC, HTA, índice PaO2/FiO2, y la exposición a corticoides y LPV/r estuvieron asociadas a la mortalidad en pacientes hospitalizados por neumonía por SARS-CoV-2.

ABSTRACT Objective: this study aimed to describe the main factors associated to mortality in a cohort of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in a public hospital in Lima, Peru. Materials and methods: this was a retrospective cohort study, with a non-random convenience sampling. Adult patients with confirmed/suspicious SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with rapid and/ or molecular tests were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, tomographic and treatment variables were identified. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and Poisson regression techniques were used to determine the adjusted relative risk (aRR). Results: 122 patients were included, 70.5% were male, with a mean age of 55.8 years, with a history of obesity (25.4%) and high blood pressure (HBP, 13.1%). The multivariate analysis of clinical factors identified that age (aRR 1.03; 95% CI: 1,00- 1.06; p=0.021), body mass index (BMI; aRR 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05; p=0.006), HBP (aRR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.09-2.56; p=0.017), PaO2/FiO2 index (aRR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00; p<0.001), exposure to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r; aRR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91; p <0.001), and systemic corticosteroids (aRR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.09-1.27; p<0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. Conclusions : Age, BMI, HBP, PaO2/FiO2 index, and exposure to corticosteroids and LPV/r were associated with mortality in our cohort of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

[Should i treat a high risk chronic coronary syndrome invasively from the beginning? Yes, in most cases]. / Controversias en Cardiología. Parte 1. ¿Debo tratar un síndrome coronario crónico de alto riesgo invasivamente desde el inicio? Sí, en la mayoría de casos.

Chronic coronary syndrome (SCC) previously known as stable coronary disease, is the main cause of mortality in the world, and it is one of the most important in Peru. This pathology has a dynamic nature that results in different clinical scenarios that can be modified through various therapeutic options, one of which is coronary interventional treatment, mainly in patients with high ischemic risk defined as ischemia greater than 10% of the entire left ventricular mass. For this reason, we have analyzed the most relevant and current information available, concluding that the treatment of high ischemic risk´s chronic coronary syndrome, after an individual evaluation, would correspond to an invasive management from the beginning, although it would not impact on mortality or cardiovascular events, it would contribute to improve quality of life; also we should consider the incomplete availability of all the therapeutic options for the symptomatic management of this disease, the limited access to the management of acute cardiovascular events in our country, as well as the risk of adverse effects and drug interactions.